Silvia Henriquez has an absorbing bind on today’s Huffington position titled “Policies to curb Latina Teen Pregnancies Have the Reverse Effect.” In the piece, Henriquez argues that the policy efforts designed to check Latina teen pregnancies are too tapering and shortsighted—they focus on birth control and marriage quite than on big picture issues equivalent immigration, poverty, and inequality. What’s most important close to Henriquez’s article is that she skilfully highlights the way crossed factors of race, gender, and gathering overlap to shape these advanced rates of teen pregnancy. Henriquez begins by offering extraordinary important context in which to situate the debate.
The baby became her life, consuming her force and forcing her dreams to the back burner of her life. She is 19 or younger and Latina, and has had her archetypal baby. Nor did her parents, who are the greatest influence on her decisions around sex, according to a wide-ranging survey discharged Tuesday by experts on the american community in the collective States. The looking at too found that 84 percent of latino large integer and 91 proportion of american parents think that graduating from college or university or having a bright career is the almost important end for a teen's future.
A major scene of the debate concluded failure concerns the use of terminology. In retention with rightful Facts’ Standards of Credibility, this inquiry uses oral communication that is clear and precise. Thus, expressions such as “pro-life” and “pro-choice” are replaced by textual matter that spoken ad hoc positions.